Nomenclature
Wiersema, J.H., Turland, N.J., Barrie, F.R., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D.L., Herendeen, P.S., Knapp, S., Kusber, W.-H., Li, D.-Z., Marhold, K., May, T.W., McNeill, J., Monro, A.M., Prado, J., Price, M.J. & Smith, G.F. 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017: Appendices I to VII. Online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/codes-proposals/> [accessed 31 may 2024]

 

Date de publication : Deut. Fl., (9): 870. 1882 [09/1882, fide TL-2, 3525].

Nomenclature : Ziziphyus jujuba Mill. 1768, nom. cons. vs. Ziziphus zizyphus (L.) H.Karst. 1882, nom. rej.!
Voir Kirkbride et al. Taxon, 55(4): 1049-1050. 11/2006.

Nomenclature : Nom. rej. versus Ziziphus jujuba Mill., 1768 [nom. cons.]

     Références : Wiersema et al. (2018)

Validité : D'après Kirkbride et al. (Taxon, 55(4): 1049-1050. 11/2006): "Though publishing the apparent tautonym "Zizyphus zizyphus" by citing "Z. Rhamnus L. Zizyphus Krst." in a paragraph beginning with the generic name "Zizyphus Tourn.", Karsten committed a correctable error (Art. 61.4) by altering the original generic spelling of Ziziphus Mill. An exactly parallel situation exists with the name Lycopersicon lycopersicum (L.) H.Karst. (l.c.: 966, "Lycopersicum lycopersicum"), which is cited in this way in App. IV of the ICBN (p. 453) as a nomen specificum rejiciendum in favour of L. esculentum Mill., supporting the conclusions of Nicolson (in Taxon 24: 390. 1975) and Terrell & al. (in Taxon 32: 311. 1983). Previous proposals to amend Art. 23.4, regarding tautonyms, by Little (in Taxon 23: 878. 1974) and Terrell (in Taxon 26: 131. 1977) were not accepted by the Leningrad and Sydney Congresses, making it clear that such "paratautonyms" are not to be rejected as names not validly published."