Orchidaceae de France métropolitaine
84 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.
| Référence | Total | Valides | Espèces | Taxons terminaux | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | |
| Tison et al. (2014) | 493 | 18,25% | 163 | 24,44% | 131 | 23,91% | 129 | 20,91% |
| Bock (2011) | 59 | 2,18% | 45 | 6,75% | 41 | 7,48% | 44 | 7,13% |
| Rouy (1912) | 41 | 1,52% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Linnaeus (1753) | 24 | 0,89% | 4 | 0,6% | 2 | 0,36% | 2 | 0,32% |
| Richter (1890) | 18 | 0,67% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Crantz (1769) | 10 | 0,37% | 2 | 0,3% | 2 | 0,36% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Euro+Med (2006) | 10 | 0,37% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Wiersema et al. (2018) | 9 | 0,33% | 2 | 0,3% | 2 | 0,36% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Bubani & Penzig (1902) | 8 | 0,3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Delforge (2021) | 8 | 0,3% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Fournier (1934-1940) | 8 | 0,3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Lewis & Kreutz (2022) | 7 | 0,26% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 0 | 0% |
| Scopoli (1771) | 7 | 0,26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Desfontaines (1798) | 6 | 0,22% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Fournier (1928) | 6 | 0,22% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Ascherson & Graebner (1907) | 5 | 0,19% | 2 | 0,3% | 2 | 0,36% | 2 | 0,32% |
| Bonnier & Layens (1894) | 5 | 0,19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Koch (1837) | 5 | 0,19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Persoon (1807) | 5 | 0,19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Salisbury (1796) | 5 | 0,19% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Arcangeli (1882) | 4 | 0,15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Balayer (1986) | 4 | 0,15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Bock & Tison (2012) | 4 | 0,15% | 3 | 0,45% | 3 | 0,55% | 3 | 0,49% |
| Delforge (2011) | 4 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Gray (1821) | 4 | 0,15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Grenier & Godron (1856) | 4 | 0,15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Hoffmann (1804) | 4 | 0,15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Lamarck (1779) | 4 | 0,15% | 2 | 0,3% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Reichenbach (1830-1832) | 4 | 0,15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Tenore (1811-1815) | 4 | 0,15% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Kuntze (1891) | 3 | 0,11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Lamarck (1798) | 3 | 0,11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Linnaeus (1759) | 3 | 0,11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Linnaeus (1763) | 3 | 0,11% | 2 | 0,3% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Nyman (1882) | 3 | 0,11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Richard (1817) | 3 | 0,11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Sprengel (1826) | 3 | 0,11% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Véla (2015) | 3 | 0,11% | 3 | 0,45% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 0,49% |
| Villars (1787) | 3 | 0,11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Allioni (1785) | 2 | 0,07% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Antonetti et al. (2006) | 2 | 0,07% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Candolle (1815) | 2 | 0,07% | 2 | 0,3% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Delforge (1996) | 2 | 0,07% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Léveillé (1917) | 2 | 0,07% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| L'Orchidophile, 192 : 29-38">Martin & Véla (2012) | 2 | 0,07% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Pedersen (2000) | 2 | 0,07% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Romolini & Soca (2011) | 2 | 0,07% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Schrank et al. (1789) | 2 | 0,07% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Schur (1866) | 2 | 0,07% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Soca (2020) | 2 | 0,07% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Uicn et al. (2012) | 2 | 0,07% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Anonyme. (2002) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 0 | 0% |
| Anonyme. (2002) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Anonyme (2023) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Barla (1868) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Braun-blanquet (1933) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Cariot & Saint-lager (1889) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Delforge (1998) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Delforge (2023) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Dulac (1867) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Dumortier (1827) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Gouan (1773) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Gussone (1843) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Host (1831) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Kerguélen & Bock (2011) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Lapeyrouse (1813) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Linnaeus (1767) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Loiseleur-deslongchamps (1807) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Looken & Van (2005) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Margońska (2019) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 0 | 0% |
| Miller (1768) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Moench (1794) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Munzinger et al. (2016) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Murray (1784) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Nicole & Soca (2017) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Nomina Nova Generis Dactylorhiza (Combinationes novæ ab auctore in Ann. Univ. Scient. Budapest, sect. Biol. 3 (1960) non jure pleno publicatae) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Rouy (1913) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Schrader (1799) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Soó (1927) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Steudel (1821) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Tison & de Foucault (2015) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 1 | 0,16% |
| Valentin et al. (2010) | 1 | 0,04% | 1 | 0,15% | 1 | 0,18% | 0 | 0% |
| Villars (1779) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Walravens (1995) | 1 | 0,04% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
