Bivalves d'eau douce de France métropolitaine
Bivalvia d'eau douce (sens large) de France métropolitaine : inclut les espèces strictement d'eau douce (habitat 2) ou également retrouvées dans le milieu marin (habitat 4 = eau douce / marin).
66 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.
| Référence | Total | Valides | Espèces | Taxons terminaux | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | |
| Prié (2017) | 101 | 34,59% | 92 | 180,39% | 82 | 178,26% | 86 | 179,17% |
| Falkner et al. (2002) | 66 | 22,6% | 25 | 49,02% | 21 | 45,65% | 23 | 47,92% |
| Gargominy et al. (2011) | 63 | 21,58% | 41 | 80,39% | 37 | 80,43% | 39 | 81,25% |
| Lopes-Lima et al. (2016) | 12 | 4,11% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Linnaeus (1758) | 5 | 1,71% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Macé (1860) | 5 | 1,71% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Müller (1774) | 5 | 1,71% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Prié et al. (2012) | 4 | 1,37% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Dewarumez et al. (2011) | 3 | 1,03% | 3 | 5,88% | 3 | 6,52% | 3 | 6,25% |
| Dupuy (1849) | 3 | 1,03% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Welter-schultes (2012) | 3 | 1,03% | 3 | 5,88% | 3 | 6,52% | 3 | 6,25% |
| Breton (2014) | 2 | 0,68% | 2 | 3,92% | 2 | 4,35% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Delannoye et al. (2015) | 2 | 0,68% | 2 | 3,92% | 2 | 4,35% | 2 | 4,17% |
| Goulletquer (2016) | 2 | 0,68% | 2 | 3,92% | 2 | 4,35% | 2 | 4,17% |
| Høpner et al. (1971) | 2 | 0,68% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Lamarck (1818) | 2 | 0,68% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Letacq (1924) | 2 | 0,68% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Lopes-lima et al. (2024) | 2 | 0,68% | 2 | 3,92% | 2 | 4,35% | 2 | 4,17% |
| Massemin et al. (2009) | 2 | 0,68% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Payraudeau (1826) | 2 | 0,68% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Prié & Puillandre (2014) | 2 | 0,68% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Anonyme. (2004) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Anonyme. (2004) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Bespalaya et al. (2017) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| bij de Vaate & Beisel (2011) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Bonhomme (1840) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Boubée (1833-1834) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Combrisson (2023) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Conrad (1831) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Cuvier (1798) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Faillettaz et al. (2020) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Fruget & Beisel (2016) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Girardi (2003) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Groh et al. (2020) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Haas (1969) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Kerckhof et al. (2017) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Lamy & Pointier (2018) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Lea (1834) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Locard (1882) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Lopes-lima et al. (2018) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Lowe et al. (2007) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 0 | 0% |
| Marescaux et al. (2012) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Mouthon & Forcellini (2017) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Mouthon & Loiseau (2000) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Mouthon et al. (2017) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Mouthon et al. (2021) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Nakamura et al. (2024) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Normand (1844) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Pallas (1771) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Pasco et al. (2023) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Pezy et al. (2022) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Phillips (1928) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Pigneur et al. (2011) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Poli (1791) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Prié & Fruget (2017) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Prié et al. (2012) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Prié et al. (2012) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Puissauve, Barthelemy & Lamand (2015) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Puissauve, Cohen, Barthelemy & Reygnaud (2015) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Quiñonero-salgado & López-soriano (2017) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
| Rossmässler (1842) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Say (1829) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Sheppard (1823) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Spengler (1793) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Stepien et al. (2013) | 1 | 0,34% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Wolowicz (1992) | 1 | 0,34% | 1 | 1,96% | 1 | 2,17% | 1 | 2,08% |
