Mousses de Martinique
Bryidae de Martinique
51 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.
| Référence | Total | Valides | Espèces | Taxons terminaux | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | |
| Lavocat Bernard & Schäfer-Verwimp (2011) | 492 | 146.43% | 366 | 190.62% | 338 | 194.25% | 362 | 196.74% |
| Florschütz-de Waard et al. (2011) | 111 | 33.04% | 74 | 38.54% | 70 | 40.23% | 71 | 38.59% |
| Thouvenot & Bardat (2010) | 42 | 12.5% | 15 | 7.81% | 14 | 8.05% | 15 | 8.15% |
| Lavocat Bernard (2018) | 29 | 8.63% | 22 | 11.46% | 17 | 9.77% | 22 | 11.96% |
| O’Shea (2006) | 27 | 8.04% | 20 | 10.42% | 18 | 10.34% | 19 | 10.33% |
| Hill et al. (2006) | 19 | 5.65% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Carvalho-silva et al. (2017) | 14 | 4.17% | 7 | 3.65% | 7 | 4.02% | 7 | 3.8% |
| Buck (2003) | 13 | 3.87% | 9 | 4.69% | 4 | 2.3% | 9 | 4.89% |
| Bruggeman-Nannenga & Arts (2010) | 12 | 3.57% | 6 | 3.12% | 6 | 3.45% | 5 | 2.72% |
| Bruggeman-Nannenga et al. (1994) | 12 | 3.57% | 3 | 1.56% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 1.63% |
| Ros et al. (2013) | 10 | 2.98% | 5 | 2.6% | 5 | 2.87% | 5 | 2.72% |
| Majestyk (2011) | 9 | 2.68% | 2 | 1.04% | 2 | 1.15% | 2 | 1.09% |
| Reese & Mohamed (1985) | 9 | 2.68% | 3 | 1.56% | 3 | 1.72% | 3 | 1.63% |
| Koponen (2020) | 8 | 2.38% | 2 | 1.04% | 2 | 1.15% | 2 | 1.09% |
| Whittier (1976) | 8 | 2.38% | 2 | 1.04% | 2 | 1.15% | 2 | 1.09% |
| Thériot et al. (1934) | 6 | 1.79% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Atwood (2015) | 5 | 1.49% | 2 | 1.04% | 2 | 1.15% | 2 | 1.09% |
| Hugonnot et al. (2017) | 5 | 1.49% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Enroth et al. (2019) | 4 | 1.19% | 2 | 1.04% | 2 | 1.15% | 2 | 1.09% |
| Frahm (2010) | 4 | 1.19% | 2 | 1.04% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Hodgetts & Lockhart (2020) | 4 | 1.19% | 4 | 2.08% | 4 | 2.3% | 4 | 2.17% |
| Câmara (2011) | 3 | 0.89% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Kučera et al. (2013) | 3 | 0.89% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Bescherelle (1873) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Bescherelle (1895) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Bescherelle (1895) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Bescherelle (1901) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Câmara (2011) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Coulis et al. (2022) | 2 | 0.6% | 2 | 1.04% | 2 | 1.15% | 2 | 1.09% |
| Hodgetts et al. (2020) | 2 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| La Farge (2002) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Lavocat Bernard & Reeb (2016) | 2 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Lindberg (1865) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Müller & Tan (2013) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Ochi (1972) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Spence & Ramsay (2005) | 2 | 0.6% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Whittier & Miller (1967) | 2 | 0.6% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Wilbraham & Ellis (2010) | 2 | 0.6% | 2 | 1.04% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Ah-Peng & Bardat (2005) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Ah-Peng et al. (2010) | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Ah-Peng (2007) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Crosby (1969) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Ellis et al. (2016) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Enroth (1990) | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Etcheberry et al. (1987) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Gama et al. (2015) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Iwatsuki & Suzuki (1989) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Meyer & Ah-Peng (2024) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Müller (2012) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
| Spence (2009) | 1 | 0.3% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Véron et al. (2021) | 1 | 0.3% | 1 | 0.52% | 1 | 0.57% | 1 | 0.54% |
