Vous entrerez en mode d'édition pour chaque taxon et page auxquels vous avez les droits d'accès.




[ Mot de passe perdu ]


Rongeurs actuels de France métropolitaine

Rodentia actuellement présents en France métropolitaine (exclut les espèces disparues ou éteintes)

108 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.

Référence Total Valides Espèces Taxons terminaux
nb % nb % nb % nb %
Aulagnier (2009) 48 15% 43 104,88% 43 122,86% 35 100%
Aulagnier et al. (2017) 32 10% 27 65,85% 27 77,14% 23 65,71%
Saint et al. (1978) 12 3,75% 9 21,95% 9 25,71% 7 20%
Linnaeus (1758) 10 3,12% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 1 2,86%
Lorvelec et al. (2007) 10 3,12% 10 24,39% 10 28,57% 6 17,14%
Burneleau (1983) 7 2,19% 7 17,07% 7 20% 5 14,29%
Krystufek (2017) 7 2,19% 5 12,2% 4 11,43% 4 11,43%
Ladent et al. (2021) 6 1,88% 6 14,63% 6 17,14% 4 11,43%
Miller (1908) 6 1,88% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 0 0%
Soubeyran et al. (2011) 6 1,88% 6 14,63% 6 17,14% 4 11,43%
Thévenot (2014) 5 1,56% 5 12,2% 5 14,29% 4 11,43%
Aulagnier (2012) 4 1,25% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Beaucornu (1962) 4 1,25% 4 9,76% 4 11,43% 4 11,43%
Linnaeus (1766) 4 1,25% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Lowe et al. (2007) 4 1,25% 4 9,76% 4 11,43% 3 8,57%
Brunet-lecomte & Volobouev (1994) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 3 8,57%
Catzeflis (2018) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 2 5,71%
Gargominy et al. (1996) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 2 5,71%
Krystufek (2017) 3 0,94% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 2 5,71%
Questel & Le Quellec (2012) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 2 5,71%
Questel (2020) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 2 5,71%
Storch & Lutt (1989) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 3 8,57%
Theuerkauf et al. (2010) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 2 5,71%
Vogel et al. (1991) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 3 8,57%
Yokoyama (2013) 3 0,94% 3 7,32% 3 8,57% 2 5,71%
Beaucournu (1974) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 2 5,71%
Blasius (1857) 2 0,62% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Bochaton et al. (2021) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 2 5,71%
Brunet-Lecomte & Chaline (1993) 2 0,62% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Brunet-Lecomte (2010) 2 0,62% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Castiglia et al. (2008) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 2 5,71%
Dozières (2012) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 1 2,86%
Frenot et al. (2005) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 1 2,86%
Gerbe & Lisle (1880) 2 0,62% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gerbe (1873) 2 0,62% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gerbe (1879) 2 0,62% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Godet et al. (2021) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 0 0%
Jourdan (2020) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 1 2,86%
Krystufek (2017) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 0 0% 2 5,71%
Lacoste (de) (2020) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 1 2,86%
Musser & Carleton (2005) 2 0,62% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Prévost & Mougin (1970) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 1 2,86%
Reutter et al. (2002) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 2 5,71%
Revilliod (1914) 2 0,62% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Uicn et al. (2015) 2 0,62% 2 4,88% 2 5,71% 1 2,86%
Albaret (2008) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Amand et al. (2012) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Ancillotto, L., Mori, E., Sozio, G., Solano, E., Bertolino, S. & Russo, D. 2017. A novel approach to field identification of cryptic Apodemus wood mice: calls differ more than morphology. Mammal Review, 47: 6–10. 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Anonyme. (2004) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Aulagnier (2019) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Bakhoum et al. (2015) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Bastelica (2010) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Bournaud & Gautheron-Duranthon (1969) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Brunet-lecomte (1995) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Chapuis et al. (2011) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Chapuis et al. (2014) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Chapuis (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 0 0%
Chapuis (2005) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 0 0%
Chapuis (2017) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Crespon (1844) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Deblock et al. (1960) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Dieme et al. (2015) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Dozières et al. (2010) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Dozières et al. (2015) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
DREAL Alsace & MEDAD (2007) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Fatio (1905) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Faugier & Bulliffon (2015) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Gerbe (1852) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gerbe (1879) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gerriet (2009) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Heim et al. (1967) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Heinrich (1951) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Jouanin (1986) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Jouanin (1992) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Jourdane & Mas-Coma (1977) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Kamenova (2009) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Krapp & Winking (1976) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Legros, Puissauve & Haffner (2015) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Linnaeus (1761) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Lurz et al. (2013) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Major (1905) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Marsot et al. (2011) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 0 0% 1 2,86%
Melchior (1834) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Nappi et al. (2019) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Obolenskaya et al. (2009) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 0 0% 1 2,86%
Pallas (1771) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Pallas (1778) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Pascal & Chapuis (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Pascal & Vigne (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 0 0%
Pascal & Vigne (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Pascal & Vigne (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Pascal (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Pascal (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Ramousse & Le Berre (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 0 0%
Renaud et al. (2013) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Sardin & Bauchet (1985) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Schaefer (1935) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Sélys-Longchamp de (1847) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Sélys-Longchamps (1838) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
SORDELLO (2012) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 0 0%
Vein et al. (2013) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Vigne (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Vigne (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Vigne (2003) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Virion (2018) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Wencel (2000) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Yoccoz (1992) 1 0,31% 1 2,44% 1 2,86% 1 2,86%
Zilli (2021) 1 0,31% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%

Dix espèces au hasard