Ochrophytes marines de Clipperton
22 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.
Référence | Total | Valides | Espèces | Taxons terminaux | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | |
Payri et al. (2009) | 10 | 12,82% | 7 | 63,64% | 7 | 63,64% | 7 | 63,64% |
Bourmaud (2003) | 7 | 8,97% | 5 | 45,45% | 5 | 45,45% | 5 | 45,45% |
Payri (2007) | 7 | 8,97% | 5 | 45,45% | 5 | 45,45% | 5 | 45,45% |
N'Yeurt & Payri (2006) | 6 | 7,69% | 4 | 36,36% | 4 | 36,36% | 4 | 36,36% |
Burel et al. (2019) | 4 | 5,13% | 4 | 36,36% | 4 | 36,36% | 4 | 36,36% |
Delnatte & Wynne (2016) | 4 | 5,13% | 3 | 27,27% | 3 | 27,27% | 3 | 27,27% |
Vroman (1968) | 4 | 5,13% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% |
Rapport GIS "Lag-May" & Centre d'Océanologie de Marseille, pour le compte de DAF Mayotte, SPEM & FFEM. 126 pp.">Thomassin et al. (1999) | 3 | 3,85% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% |
Brugneaux (2012) | 2 | 2,56% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% |
Hédouin et al. (2008) | 2 | 2,56% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% |
Kitayama & Garrigue (1998) | 2 | 2,56% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% |
Mattio et al. (2015) | 2 | 2,56% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% |
N'Yeurt & Payri (2004) | 2 | 2,56% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% |
Payri & N'yeurt (1997) | 2 | 2,56% | 1 | 9,09% | 1 | 9,09% | 1 | 9,09% |
Rodríguez-Prieto et al. (1999) | 2 | 2,56% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% | 2 | 18,18% |
Nelson-Smith et al. (2014) | 1 | 1,28% | 1 | 9,09% | 1 | 9,09% | 1 | 9,09% |
Pearman et al. (2020) | 1 | 1,28% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Santiañez et al. (2018) | 1 | 1,28% | 1 | 9,09% | 1 | 9,09% | 1 | 9,09% |
Taylor (1973) | 1 | 1,28% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Thomassin et al. (1992) | 1 | 1,28% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Vieira et al. (2014) | 1 | 1,28% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Vieira et al. (2019) | 1 | 1,28% | 1 | 9,09% | 1 | 9,09% | 1 | 9,09% |