Algues rouges marines de Mayotte
35 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.
| Référence | Total | Valides | Espèces | Taxons terminaux | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | |
| Cabioc'h & Floc'h (2014) | 63 | 7.67% | 46 | 30.67% | 46 | 31.51% | 46 | 31.29% |
| N'Yeurt & Payri (2010) | 56 | 6.82% | 46 | 30.67% | 46 | 31.51% | 44 | 29.93% |
| Payri (2007) | 54 | 6.58% | 35 | 23.33% | 35 | 23.97% | 33 | 22.45% |
| Silva et al. (1996) | 54 | 6.58% | 48 | 32% | 44 | 30.14% | 46 | 31.29% |
| Rapport GIS "Lag-May" & Centre d'Océanologie de Marseille, pour le compte de DAF Mayotte, SPEM & FFEM. 126 pp.">Thomassin et al. (1999) | 53 | 6.46% | 37 | 24.67% | 37 | 25.34% | 37 | 25.17% |
| N'Yeurt & Payri (2004) | 41 | 4.99% | 27 | 18% | 27 | 18.49% | 25 | 17.01% |
| Mattio et al. (2015) | 39 | 4.75% | 37 | 24.67% | 37 | 25.34% | 36 | 24.49% |
| Vroman (1968) | 39 | 4.75% | 24 | 16% | 24 | 16.44% | 24 | 16.33% |
| Delnatte & Wynne (2016) | 38 | 4.63% | 35 | 23.33% | 35 | 23.97% | 35 | 23.81% |
| Thomassin et al. (1992) | 37 | 4.51% | 19 | 12.67% | 19 | 13.01% | 19 | 12.93% |
| Bourmaud (2003) | 34 | 4.14% | 20 | 13.33% | 20 | 13.7% | 20 | 13.61% |
| Rodríguez-Prieto et al. (1999) | 30 | 3.65% | 24 | 16% | 24 | 16.44% | 24 | 16.33% |
| Burel et al. (2019) | 26 | 3.17% | 25 | 16.67% | 25 | 17.12% | 25 | 17.01% |
| CEVA (2011) | 23 | 2.8% | 14 | 9.33% | 14 | 9.59% | 13 | 8.84% |
| Payri et al. (2009) | 16 | 1.95% | 11 | 7.33% | 11 | 7.53% | 11 | 7.48% |
| Nicet & Denis (2011) | 14 | 1.71% | 12 | 8% | 12 | 8.22% | 12 | 8.16% |
| Payri & N'yeurt (1997) | 12 | 1.46% | 6 | 4% | 6 | 4.11% | 6 | 4.08% |
| Segonzac (1984) | 11 | 1.34% | 2 | 1.33% | 2 | 1.37% | 2 | 1.36% |
| Brugneaux (2012) | 7 | 0.85% | 4 | 2.67% | 4 | 2.74% | 4 | 2.72% |
| Diaz & Cuzange (2009) | 5 | 0.61% | 4 | 2.67% | 4 | 2.74% | 4 | 2.72% |
| Pearman et al. (2020) | 5 | 0.61% | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2.05% | 3 | 2.04% |
| Nelson-Smith et al. (2014) | 4 | 0.49% | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2.05% | 3 | 2.04% |
| Rignault & Chevallier (2017) | 3 | 0.37% | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2.05% | 3 | 2.04% |
| Brugneaux & Pérès (2006) | 2 | 0.24% | 1 | 0.67% | 1 | 0.68% | 1 | 0.68% |
| Goulletquer (2016) | 2 | 0.24% | 2 | 1.33% | 2 | 1.37% | 2 | 1.36% |
| Rousseau et al. (2017) | 2 | 0.24% | 2 | 1.33% | 2 | 1.37% | 2 | 1.36% |
| Zubia et al. (2018) | 2 | 0.24% | 2 | 1.33% | 2 | 1.37% | 2 | 1.36% |
| Dewarumez et al. (2011) | 1 | 0.12% | 1 | 0.67% | 1 | 0.68% | 1 | 0.68% |
| Kitayama & Garrigue (1998) | 1 | 0.12% | 1 | 0.67% | 1 | 0.68% | 1 | 0.68% |
| Knoepffler et al. (1990) | 1 | 0.12% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Le Duff & Gall (2015) | 1 | 0.12% | 1 | 0.67% | 1 | 0.68% | 1 | 0.68% |
| Le Gallo (1949) | 1 | 0.12% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Payri, N'Yeurt & Orempuller (2000) | 1 | 0.12% | 1 | 0.67% | 1 | 0.68% | 1 | 0.68% |
| Taylor (1973) | 1 | 0.12% | 1 | 0.67% | 1 | 0.68% | 1 | 0.68% |
| Uicn et al. (2019) | 1 | 0.12% | 1 | 0.67% | 1 | 0.68% | 1 | 0.68% |
