Vous entrerez en mode d'édition pour chaque taxon et page auxquels vous avez les droits d'accès.




[ Mot de passe perdu ]


Mammifères marins de Mayotte

115 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.

Référence Total Valides Espèces Taxons terminaux
nb % nb % nb % nb %
Rinaldi (2016) 92 22,38% 92 328,57% 92 383,33% 76 316,67%
Carzon et al. (2016) 69 16,79% 69 246,43% 69 287,5% 57 237,5%
Estrade et al. (2016) 69 16,79% 69 246,43% 69 287,5% 57 237,5%
Uicn et al. (2015) 28 6,81% 28 100% 28 116,67% 22 91,67%
Charrassin (2016) 23 5,6% 23 82,14% 23 95,83% 19 79,17%
Charrassin (2016) 23 5,6% 23 82,14% 23 95,83% 19 79,17%
Moutou (2016) 23 5,6% 23 82,14% 23 95,83% 19 79,17%
Spitz et al. (2016) 23 5,6% 23 82,14% 23 95,83% 19 79,17%
Thoisy & Bordin (2016) 23 5,6% 23 82,14% 23 95,83% 19 79,17%
Urtizberea (2016) 23 5,6% 23 82,14% 23 95,83% 19 79,17%
Jarrett & Shirihai (2014) 22 5,35% 22 78,57% 22 91,67% 18 75%
Garrigue (2007) 20 4,87% 20 71,43% 20 83,33% 16 66,67%
G.E.M.M. (2012) 19 4,62% 19 67,86% 19 79,17% 15 62,5%
Kiszka et al.(2007) 19 4,62% 17 60,71% 17 70,83% 13 54,17%
Bordin et al. (2021) 18 4,38% 18 64,29% 18 75% 14 58,33%
Gannier (2001) 18 4,38% 18 64,29% 18 75% 14 58,33%
Gannier (2002) 17 4,14% 17 60,71% 17 70,83% 13 54,17%
Dewynter et al. (2021) 16 3,89% 16 57,14% 16 66,67% 13 54,17%
Gannier (2009) 16 3,89% 16 57,14% 16 66,67% 12 50%
Kiszka et al. (2010) 16 3,89% 15 53,57% 15 62,5% 12 50%
Catzeflis (2012) 15 3,65% 15 53,57% 15 62,5% 11 45,83%
Gannier (2000) 15 3,65% 15 53,57% 15 62,5% 11 45,83%
Aulagnier (2009) 13 3,16% 13 46,43% 13 54,17% 11 45,83%
Laran et al. (2011) 13 3,16% 13 46,43% 13 54,17% 10 41,67%
Dulau-Drouot et al. (2008) 12 2,92% 12 42,86% 12 50% 8 33,33%
Uicn et al. (2017) 12 2,92% 12 42,86% 12 50% 8 33,33%
Questel (2020) 8 1,95% 8 28,57% 8 33,33% 4 16,67%
Samaran & Guinet (2009) 8 1,95% 8 28,57% 8 33,33% 7 29,17%
Questel & Le Quellec (2012) 7 1,7% 7 25% 7 29,17% 3 12,5%
Perrin et al. (2002) 6 1,46% 6 21,43% 6 25% 5 20,83%
IUCN (2012) 5 1,22% 5 17,86% 5 20,83% 3 12,5%
Linnaeus (1758) 5 1,22% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Shirihai (2003) 5 1,22% 5 17,86% 5 20,83% 4 16,67%
Boer et al. (1999) 4 0,97% 4 14,29% 4 16,67% 4 16,67%
Robineau & Duhamel (2006) 4 0,97% 4 14,29% 4 16,67% 3 12,5%
AAMP (2012) 3 0,73% 3 10,71% 3 12,5% 0 0%
Desbrosses & Etcheberry (1987) 3 0,73% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 1 4,17%
Jefferson & Rosenbaum (2014) 3 0,73% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Laran et al. (2012) 3 0,73% 3 10,71% 3 12,5% 2 8,33%
Rossi-santos et al. (2007) 3 0,73% 3 10,71% 3 12,5% 2 8,33%
Uicn et al. (2020) 3 0,73% 3 10,71% 3 12,5% 2 8,33%
Boer & Simmonds (2000) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Cottarel et al. (2013) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Diaz & Cuzange (2009) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 0 0%
Fourt et al. (2017) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Gannier & Petiau (2006) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 0 0%
Garrigue & Poupon (2013) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Garrigue et al. (2022) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Kasamatsu & Joyce (1995) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Kock et al. (2006) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Leaper et al. (2008) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Robineau (2005) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 1 4,17%
Thiele et al. (1999) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Thiele et al. (2004) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 1 4,17%
Van Canneytet al. (2008) 2 0,49% 2 7,14% 2 8,33% 2 8,33%
Abril et al. (1986) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Ainley et al. (2007) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Andrew et al. (2008) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Anonyme. (2004) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Anonyme (2023) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Best et al. (1995) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Boer (2000) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Borsa (1997) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Branch (2010) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Cerchio et al. (2009) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Collectif (2009) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Collet & Duguy (1981) 1 0,24% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Counihan et al. (2012) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Dalebout et al. (2005) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Dalebout et al. (2012) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Ersts & Rosenbaum (2003) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Fleming & Jackson (2011) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Gill & Thiele (1997) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Gillespie (1997) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Goodall et al. (1997) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Gray (1846) 1 0,24% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gray (1864) 1 0,24% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gray (1865) 1 0,24% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Guinet (1991) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Guinet (2004) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Heimlich-boran (1993) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Jefferson & Barros (1997) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Jehl et al. (1980) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Johnson & Wolman (1984) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Kasamatsu et al. (2000) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Kiszka et al. (2009) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Heron, 36(1): 31-34.">Kiszka (2003) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Krajewsky (2012) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Labach et al. (2021) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Leaper et al. (2008) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Leatherwood et al. (1979) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Macleod et al. (2006) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Matsuoka et al. (2005) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Müller (1776) 1 0,24% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Murase et al. (2002) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Nicol et al. (2000) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Oremus (2009) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Perrin et al. (1994) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Pitman & Ensor (2003) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Praderi et al. (1992) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Prévost & Mougin (1970) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Pusineri & Caceres (2012) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Pusineri et al. (2013) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Riccialdelli et al. (2010) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Robineau (1989) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Roche & Guinet (2007) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Rosenbaum & Collins (2006) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Smith et al. (2005) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
UICN (2009) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Viale & Frontier (1989) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Wada et al. (2003) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Weerdt (2023) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Williams et al. (2009) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 0 0%
Wursig & Wursig (1980) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%
Zelhuber (2009) 1 0,24% 1 3,57% 1 4,17% 1 4,17%

Dix espèces au hasard