Vous entrerez en mode d'édition pour chaque taxon et page auxquels vous avez les droits d'accès.




[ Mot de passe perdu ]


Mammifères marins de Saint-Barthélemy

96 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.

Référence Total Valides Espèces Taxons terminaux
nb % nb % nb % nb %
Rinaldi (2016) 44 18,64% 44 275% 44 366,67% 28 233,33%
Carzon et al. (2016) 33 13,98% 33 206,25% 33 275% 21 175%
Estrade et al. (2016) 33 13,98% 33 206,25% 33 275% 21 175%
Uicn et al. (2015) 14 5,93% 14 87,5% 14 116,67% 9 75%
Charrassin (2016) 11 4,66% 11 68,75% 11 91,67% 7 58,33%
Charrassin (2016) 11 4,66% 11 68,75% 11 91,67% 7 58,33%
Dewynter et al. (2021) 11 4,66% 11 68,75% 11 91,67% 7 58,33%
Jarrett & Shirihai (2014) 11 4,66% 11 68,75% 11 91,67% 7 58,33%
Moutou (2016) 11 4,66% 11 68,75% 11 91,67% 7 58,33%
Spitz et al. (2016) 11 4,66% 11 68,75% 11 91,67% 7 58,33%
Thoisy & Bordin (2016) 11 4,66% 11 68,75% 11 91,67% 7 58,33%
Urtizberea (2016) 11 4,66% 11 68,75% 11 91,67% 7 58,33%
Bordin et al. (2021) 10 4,24% 10 62,5% 10 83,33% 6 50%
Catzeflis (2012) 9 3,81% 9 56,25% 9 75% 5 41,67%
Garrigue (2007) 9 3,81% 9 56,25% 9 75% 6 50%
Questel (2020) 9 3,81% 9 56,25% 9 75% 6 50%
Uicn et al. (2017) 9 3,81% 9 56,25% 9 75% 5 41,67%
Gannier (2001) 8 3,39% 8 50% 8 66,67% 5 41,67%
Gannier (2002) 8 3,39% 8 50% 8 66,67% 5 41,67%
Gannier (2009) 8 3,39% 8 50% 8 66,67% 5 41,67%
G.E.M.M. (2012) 8 3,39% 8 50% 8 66,67% 5 41,67%
Questel & Le Quellec (2012) 8 3,39% 8 50% 8 66,67% 5 41,67%
Aulagnier (2009) 7 2,97% 7 43,75% 7 58,33% 5 41,67%
Dulau-Drouot et al. (2008) 7 2,97% 7 43,75% 7 58,33% 4 33,33%
Gannier (2000) 7 2,97% 7 43,75% 7 58,33% 4 33,33%
Kiszka et al.(2007) 7 2,97% 7 43,75% 7 58,33% 4 33,33%
Laran et al. (2011) 7 2,97% 7 43,75% 7 58,33% 5 41,67%
Kiszka et al. (2010) 6 2,54% 6 37,5% 6 50% 4 33,33%
Linnaeus (1758) 6 2,54% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 1 8,33%
Samaran & Guinet (2009) 5 2,12% 5 31,25% 5 41,67% 4 33,33%
Desbrosses & Etcheberry (1987) 4 1,69% 3 18,75% 3 25% 2 16,67%
IUCN (2012) 4 1,69% 4 25% 4 33,33% 3 25%
Perrin et al. (2002) 4 1,69% 4 25% 4 33,33% 3 25%
AAMP (2012) 3 1,27% 3 18,75% 3 25% 1 8,33%
Lorvelec et al. (2007) 3 1,27% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 0 0%
Robineau & Duhamel (2006) 3 1,27% 3 18,75% 3 25% 2 16,67%
Shirihai (2003) 3 1,27% 3 18,75% 3 25% 2 16,67%
Boer et al. (1999) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Diaz & Cuzange (2009) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 0 0%
Fourt et al. (2017) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Gannier & Petiau (2006) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Kasamatsu & Joyce (1995) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Kock et al. (2006) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Laran et al. (2012) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Leaper et al. (2008) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Robineau (2005) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 1 8,33%
Rossi-santos et al. (2007) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 1 8,33%
Thiele et al. (1999) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Thiele et al. (2004) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 1 8,33%
Van Canneytet al. (2008) 2 0,85% 2 12,5% 2 16,67% 2 16,67%
Ainley et al. (2007) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Andrew et al. (2008) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Anonyme. (2004) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Best et al. (1995) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Boer (2000) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Borsa (1997) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Branch (2010) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Cerchio et al. (2009) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Collectif (2009) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Collet & Duguy (1981) 1 0,42% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Counihan et al. (2012) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Ersts & Rosenbaum (2003) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Fleming & Jackson (2011) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Gill & Thiele (1997) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Gillespie (1997) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Gray (1846) 1 0,42% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gray (1850) 1 0,42% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Guinet (1991) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Guinet (2004) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Heimlich-boran (1993) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Hoff & Daszkiewicz (2001) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Jehl et al. (1980) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Johnson & Wolman (1984) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Kasamatsu et al. (2000) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Kiszka et al. (2009) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Heron, 36(1): 31-34.">Kiszka (2003) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Labach et al. (2021) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Leaper et al. (2008) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Matsuoka et al. (2005) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Murase et al. (2002) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Nicol et al. (2000) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Oremus (2009) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Perrin et al. (1994) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Pitman & Ensor (2003) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Pool (2013) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Praderi et al. (1992) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Prévost & Mougin (1970) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Robineau (1989) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Roche & Guinet (2007) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Rosenbaum & Collins (2006) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Slater et al. (2014) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Smith et al. (2005) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Thoisy et al. (2003) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Uicn et al. (2020) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 1 8,33%
Weerdt (2023) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%
Williams et al. (2009) 1 0,42% 1 6,25% 1 8,33% 0 0%

Dix espèces au hasard