Vous entrerez en mode d'édition pour chaque taxon et page auxquels vous avez les droits d'accès.




[ Mot de passe perdu ]


Echinodermes de Saint-Martin

47 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.

Référence Total Valides Espèces Taxons terminaux
nb % nb % nb % nb %
Questel (2020) 24 8,79% 19 31,15% 19 31,15% 19 31,15%
Questel & Le Quellec (2012) 16 5,86% 15 24,59% 15 24,59% 15 24,59%
Brugneaux & Pérès (2006) 15 5,49% 14 22,95% 14 22,95% 14 22,95%
Ducarme (2023) 11 4,03% 11 18,03% 11 18,03% 11 18,03%
IUCN (2013) 9 3,3% 9 14,75% 9 14,75% 9 14,75%
Diaz & Cuzange (2009) 8 2,93% 7 11,48% 7 11,48% 7 11,48%
Brugneaux & Pibot (2012) 4 1,47% 3 4,92% 3 4,92% 3 4,92%
Clark & Rowe (1971) 4 1,47% 3 4,92% 3 4,92% 3 4,92%
Grolière et al. (1980) 4 1,47% 3 4,92% 3 4,92% 3 4,92%
Miloslavich, P., Díaz, J. M., Klein, E., Alvarado, J. J., Díaz, C., Gobin, J., ... & Ortiz, M. (2010). Marine biodiversity in the Caribbean: regional estimates and distribution patterns. PloS one, 5(8), e11916">Miloslavich et al. (2010) 4 1,47% 4 6,56% 4 6,56% 4 6,56%
Conand et al. (2013) 3 1,1% 3 4,92% 3 4,92% 3 4,92%
Koehler (1921) 3 1,1% 3 4,92% 3 4,92% 3 4,92%
Linnaeus (1758) 3 1,1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Paulay & Brown (2019) 3 1,1% 3 4,92% 3 4,92% 3 4,92%
Améziane (2007) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Bourmaud (2003) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Conand & ARVAM (2005) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Conand et al. (2018) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Guille et al. (1986) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Mah (2020) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Martin (2011) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Nelson-Smith et al. (2014) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Stöhr et al. (2008) 2 0,73% 2 3,28% 2 3,28% 2 3,28%
Bartsch (2008) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Bocquet (1953) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Bourcier (1988) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Breton (2014) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Canu (1891) 1 0,37% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Clark (1907) 1 0,37% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Conand et al. (2010) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Delle & Chiaje (1823-1831) 1 0,37% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Devaney (1974) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Eriksson et al. (2010) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Godet et al. (2010) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Hendler & Brugneaux (2013) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Hernández-herrejón et al. (2008) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Ifremer (2009) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Maréchal & Trégarot (2012) 1 0,37% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Marenzeller & Von (1892) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Marsh (1974) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
O’Hara & Thuy (2022) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
O'hara (2015) 1 0,37% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Rignault & Chevallier (2017) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Solís-Marín & Laguarda Figueras (2009) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Stöhr (2011) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Vergonzanne (1977) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%
Walenkamp (1979) 1 0,37% 1 1,64% 1 1,64% 1 1,64%

Dix espèces au hasard