Echinodermes de Saint-Martin
47 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.
Référence | Total | Valides | Espèces | Taxons terminaux | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | |
Questel (2020) | 24 | 8,66% | 19 | 31,15% | 19 | 31,15% | 19 | 31,15% |
Questel & Le Quellec (2012) | 16 | 5,78% | 15 | 24,59% | 15 | 24,59% | 15 | 24,59% |
Brugneaux & Pérès (2006) | 15 | 5,42% | 14 | 22,95% | 14 | 22,95% | 14 | 22,95% |
Ducarme (2023) | 11 | 3,97% | 11 | 18,03% | 11 | 18,03% | 11 | 18,03% |
IUCN (2013) | 9 | 3,25% | 9 | 14,75% | 9 | 14,75% | 9 | 14,75% |
Diaz & Cuzange (2009) | 8 | 2,89% | 7 | 11,48% | 7 | 11,48% | 7 | 11,48% |
Brugneaux & Pibot (2012) | 4 | 1,44% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% |
Clark & Rowe (1971) | 4 | 1,44% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% |
Grolière et al. (1980) | 4 | 1,44% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% |
Miloslavich, P., Díaz, J. M., Klein, E., Alvarado, J. J., Díaz, C., Gobin, J., ... & Ortiz, M. (2010). Marine biodiversity in the Caribbean: regional estimates and distribution patterns. PloS one, 5(8), e11916">Miloslavich et al. (2010) | 4 | 1,44% | 4 | 6,56% | 4 | 6,56% | 4 | 6,56% |
Conand et al. (2013) | 3 | 1,08% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% |
Koehler (1921) | 3 | 1,08% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% |
Linnaeus (1758) | 3 | 1,08% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Paulay & Brown (2019) | 3 | 1,08% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% | 3 | 4,92% |
Améziane (2007) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Bourmaud (2003) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Conand & ARVAM (2005) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Conand et al. (2018) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Guille et al. (1986) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Mah (2020) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Martin (2011) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Nelson-Smith et al. (2014) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Stöhr et al. (2008) | 2 | 0,72% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% | 2 | 3,28% |
Bartsch (2008) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Bocquet (1953) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Bourcier (1988) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Breton (2014) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Canu (1891) | 1 | 0,36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Clark (1907) | 1 | 0,36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Conand et al. (2010) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Delle & Chiaje (1823-1831) | 1 | 0,36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Devaney (1974) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Eriksson et al. (2010) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Godet et al. (2010) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Hendler & Brugneaux (2013) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Hernández-herrejón et al. (2008) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Ifremer (2009) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Maréchal & Trégarot (2012) | 1 | 0,36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Marenzeller & Von (1892) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Marsh (1974) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
O’Hara & Thuy (2022) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
O'hara (2015) | 1 | 0,36% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
Rignault & Chevallier (2017) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Solís-Marín & Laguarda Figueras (2009) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Stöhr (2011) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Vergonzanne (1977) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |
Walenkamp (1979) | 1 | 0,36% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% | 1 | 1,64% |