Vous entrerez en mode d'édition pour chaque taxon et page auxquels vous avez les droits d'accès.




[ Mot de passe perdu ]


Mammifères de Wallis-et-Futuna

Mammalia de Wallis-et-Futuna

172 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.

Référence Total Valides Espèces Taxons terminaux
nb % nb % nb % nb %
Rinaldi (2016) 64 14,58% 64 200% 64 228,57% 48 171,43%
Carzon et al. (2016) 48 10,93% 48 150% 48 171,43% 36 128,57%
Estrade et al. (2016) 48 10,93% 48 150% 48 171,43% 36 128,57%
Uicn et al. (2015) 26 5,92% 26 81,25% 26 92,86% 20 71,43%
G.E.M.M. (2012) 17 3,87% 17 53,12% 17 60,71% 13 46,43%
Aulagnier (2009) 16 3,64% 16 50% 16 57,14% 14 50%
Charrassin (2016) 16 3,64% 16 50% 16 57,14% 12 42,86%
Charrassin (2016) 16 3,64% 16 50% 16 57,14% 12 42,86%
Jarrett & Shirihai (2014) 16 3,64% 16 50% 16 57,14% 12 42,86%
Moutou (2016) 16 3,64% 16 50% 16 57,14% 12 42,86%
Spitz et al. (2016) 16 3,64% 16 50% 16 57,14% 12 42,86%
Thoisy & Bordin (2016) 16 3,64% 16 50% 16 57,14% 12 42,86%
Urtizberea (2016) 16 3,64% 16 50% 16 57,14% 12 42,86%
Bordin et al. (2021) 15 3,42% 15 46,88% 15 53,57% 11 39,29%
Gannier (2001) 15 3,42% 15 46,88% 15 53,57% 11 39,29%
Garrigue (2007) 15 3,42% 15 46,88% 15 53,57% 11 39,29%
Catzeflis (2012) 14 3,19% 14 43,75% 14 50% 10 35,71%
Dewynter et al. (2021) 14 3,19% 14 43,75% 14 50% 11 39,29%
Gannier (2009) 14 3,19% 14 43,75% 14 50% 10 35,71%
Lorvelec et al. (2007) 14 3,19% 14 43,75% 14 50% 14 50%
Questel (2020) 14 3,19% 12 37,5% 12 42,86% 8 28,57%
Gannier (2000) 13 2,96% 13 40,62% 13 46,43% 9 32,14%
Gannier (2002) 13 2,96% 13 40,62% 13 46,43% 9 32,14%
Kiszka et al.(2007) 13 2,96% 12 37,5% 12 42,86% 8 28,57%
Linnaeus (1758) 12 2,73% 6 18,75% 6 21,43% 6 21,43%
Questel & Le Quellec (2012) 12 2,73% 11 34,38% 11 39,29% 7 25%
Uicn et al. (2017) 12 2,73% 12 37,5% 12 42,86% 8 28,57%
Kiszka et al. (2010) 11 2,51% 11 34,38% 11 39,29% 8 28,57%
Laran et al. (2011) 11 2,51% 11 34,38% 11 39,29% 8 28,57%
Barré (2021) 8 1,82% 8 25% 8 28,57% 8 28,57%
Dulau-Drouot et al. (2008) 8 1,82% 8 25% 8 28,57% 4 14,29%
Theuerkauf et al. (2010) 8 1,82% 8 25% 8 28,57% 8 28,57%
Aulagnier et al. (2017) 7 1,59% 7 21,88% 7 25% 7 25%
Gargominy et al. (1996) 7 1,59% 7 21,88% 7 25% 7 25%
Samaran & Guinet (2009) 7 1,59% 7 21,88% 7 25% 6 21,43%
Soubeyran et al. (2011) 7 1,59% 7 21,88% 7 25% 7 25%
Yokoyama (2013) 7 1,59% 6 18,75% 6 21,43% 6 21,43%
Perrin et al. (2002) 6 1,37% 6 18,75% 6 21,43% 5 17,86%
Prévost & Mougin (1970) 6 1,37% 6 18,75% 6 21,43% 5 17,86%
Shirihai (2003) 6 1,37% 6 18,75% 6 21,43% 5 17,86%
Boer et al. (1999) 5 1,14% 5 15,62% 5 17,86% 5 17,86%
Jourdan (2020) 5 1,14% 5 15,62% 5 17,86% 5 17,86%
Bochaton et al. (2021) 4 0,91% 4 12,5% 4 14,29% 4 14,29%
Chaezl & Chazel (2011) 4 0,91% 4 12,5% 4 14,29% 4 14,29%
Desbrosses & Etcheberry (1987) 4 0,91% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 2 7,14%
Frenot et al. (2005) 4 0,91% 4 12,5% 4 14,29% 4 14,29%
Gentry et al. (2004) 4 0,91% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 3 10,71%
IUCN (2012) 4 0,91% 4 12,5% 4 14,29% 2 7,14%
Lowe et al. (2007) 4 0,91% 4 12,5% 4 14,29% 4 14,29%
Revilliod (1914) 4 0,91% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Robineau & Duhamel (2006) 4 0,91% 4 12,5% 4 14,29% 3 10,71%
AAMP (2012) 3 0,68% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 0 0%
Burneleau (1983) 3 0,68% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 3 10,71%
Butaud (2021) 3 0,68% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 3 10,71%
Catzeflis (2018) 3 0,68% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 3 10,71%
Fort & Barrière (2021) 3 0,68% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 3 10,71%
Laran et al. (2012) 3 0,68% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 2 7,14%
Routtier et al. (2023) 3 0,68% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Uicn et al. (2020) 3 0,68% 3 9,38% 3 10,71% 2 7,14%
Aubouin et al. (2016) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Boer & Simmonds (2000) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Boer (2000) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Borsa (1997) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Chapuis et al. (2004) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Cottarel et al. (2013) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Diaz & Cuzange (2009) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 0 0%
Fourt et al. (2017) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Gannier & Petiau (2006) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 0 0%
Gill & Thiele (1997) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Gilot et al. (1992) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Kasamatsu & Joyce (1995) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Kasamatsu et al. (2000) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 1 3,57%
Kock et al. (2006) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Lacoste (de) (2020) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Leaper et al. (2008) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Mas-Coma et al. (1989) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Miller & Wilson (1997) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Pascal et al. 2006 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
. SFEPM, Bourges. 56 pp. ">Rigaux & Dupasquier (2012) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Robineau (1989) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Robineau (2005) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 1 3,57%
Rossi-santos et al. (2007) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 1 3,57%
Saint et al. (1978) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Thiele et al. (1999) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Thiele et al. (2004) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 1 3,57%
Van Canneytet al. (2008) 2 0,46% 2 6,25% 2 7,14% 2 7,14%
Ainley et al. (2007) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Alston (1877) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Andrew et al. (2008) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Anonyme. (2004) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Aulagnier (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Bailenger et al. (1965) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Beaucournu (1968) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Best et al. (1995) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Branch (2010) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Caceres & Salamolard (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Callou (2003) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Cerchio et al. (2009) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Cheylan et al. (2022) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Collectif (2009) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Collet & Duguy (1981) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Counihan et al. (2012) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Dalebout et al. (2005) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Dalebout et al. (2012) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Deblock et al. (1960) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Des et al. (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Dieme et al. (2015) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Ersts & Rosenbaum (2003) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Fabre & Orsini (2016) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Fleming & Jackson (2011) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Garrigue & Poupon (2013) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Gillespie (1997) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Godet et al. (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Goodall et al. (1997) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Gray (1846) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gray (1864) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Gray (1865) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Guinet (1991) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Guinet (2004) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Heimlich-boran (1993) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Jefferson & Barros (1997) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Jehl et al. (1980) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Johnson & Wolman (1984) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Kasamatsu et al. (1995) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Kasamatsu et al. (1998) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Kawamura (1994) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Kiszka et al. (2009) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Heron, 36(1): 31-34.">Kiszka (2003) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Labach et al. (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Lacoste (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Lacoste (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Lancastre et al. (1976) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Leaper et al. (2008) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Leatherwood et al. (1979) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Letacq (1924) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Levesque & Mathurin (2008) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Macleod et al. (2006) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Marchandeau & Letty (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Marchandeau et al. (2003) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Matsuoka et al. (2005) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Ménard et al. (2000) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Murase et al. (2002) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Nassi et al. (1975) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Nicol et al. (2000) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Noël (2017) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Oremus (2009) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Pascal & Vigne (2003) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Pascal & Vigne (2003) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Pascal & Vigne (2003) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Peale (1848) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Pierpoint et al. (1997) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Pitman & Ensor (2003) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Randi et al. (2001) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Renaud et al. (2013) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Ribic et al. (1991) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Riccialdelli et al. (2010) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Roche & Guinet (2007) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Rosenbaum & Collins (2006) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Samaniego et al. (2020) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Savouré-Soubelet et al. (in prep.) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Savouré-Soubelet et al. (2016) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Smith et al. (2005) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Soubeyran (2008) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Széles et al. (2018) 1 0,23% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
Thévenot (2014) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
UICN Comité français, OFB & MNHN (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Viel (2021) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Weerdt (2023) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Weisler et al. (2006) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Williams et al. (2009) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 0 0%
Wursig & Wursig (1980) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%
Zelhuber (2009) 1 0,23% 1 3,12% 1 3,57% 1 3,57%

Dix espèces au hasard