Nomenclature : Molina & al. (2008b) made a proposal to conserve the name Carex leersii F. W. Schultz against the earlier homonym C. leersii Willd. and the simultaneously published heterotypic synonym C. chabertii F. W. Schultz. This proposal was accepted at the XVIII International Botanical Congress in Melbourne in 2011 and the name is now listed as thus conserved in Appendix IV of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Wiersema & al. 2015). Hence it is suggested that the name C. leersii should also be conserved against C. cuprina. I am preparing such a proposal
Références :
Koopman (2015)
Nomenclature : Nom. cons. versus C. leersii Willd., 1787 [nom. rej.] (homonyme antérieur) versus C. chabertii F. W. Schultz., 1871 [nom. rej.] et versus C. cuprina Sándor ex Heuff., 1863 [nom. rej.]
Références :
Wiersema et al. (2018)
Type : [France] Alsace,
Weissenburg, Schultz in Schultz &
Winter, Herb. Normale Phanerogam., ser. 2: No. 173 (B barcode B 10 0296416;
isotypi: B barcode B 10 0296415, K, L, M, MANCH, P).
Références :
Wiersema et al. (2018)