Carex inflata Huds., 1762 accepté comme Carex rostrata Stokes, 1787	88591

BIBLIO

Nomenclature
Wiersema, J.H., Turland, N.J., Barrie, F.R., Greuter, W., Hawksworth, D.L., Herendeen, P.S., Knapp, S., Kusber, W.-H., Li, D.-Z., Marhold, K., May, T.W., McNeill, J., Monro, A.M., Prado, J., Price, M.J. & Smith, G.F. 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017: Appendices I to VII. Online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/codes-proposals/> [accessed 31 may 2024]

 

NOTES

Neotype : Neotypus (vide Molina & al. in Taxon 55: 527. 2006): [United Kingdom, England], E. Yorkshire, Ampleforth, 5 Jul 1919, Lester-Garland 726 (K).
     Références : Wiersema et al. (2018)

Nomenclature : Nom. rej. versus Carex rostrata Stockes, 1787 [nom. et typ. cons.]
     Références : Wiersema et al. (2018)