Soricomorphes, Erinacéomorphes, Diprotodontes et Xénarthres de France
Eulipotyphla (anciennement Soricomorpha et Erinaceomorpha), Diprotodontia et Xenarthra
80 références bibliographiques sont utilisées pour les noms de rangs spécifiques de ce groupe.
| Référence | Total | Valides | Espèces | Taxons terminaux | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | nb | % | |
| Aulagnier (2009) | 29 | 12.18% | 26 | 61.9% | 26 | 92.86% | 12 | 40% |
| . SFEPM, Bourges. 56 pp. ">Rigaux & Dupasquier (2012) | 14 | 5.88% | 13 | 30.95% | 13 | 46.43% | 6 | 20% |
| Aulagnier et al. (2017) | 11 | 4.62% | 10 | 23.81% | 10 | 35.71% | 5 | 16.67% |
| Catzeflis (2012) | 9 | 3.78% | 9 | 21.43% | 9 | 32.14% | 4 | 13.33% |
| Hoff & Daszkiewicz (2001) | 9 | 3.78% | 9 | 21.43% | 9 | 32.14% | 4 | 13.33% |
| Dewynter (2020) | 8 | 3.36% | 8 | 19.05% | 8 | 28.57% | 4 | 13.33% |
| Uicn et al. (2017) | 8 | 3.36% | 8 | 19.05% | 8 | 28.57% | 4 | 13.33% |
| Catzeflis & Thoisy (2012) | 7 | 2.94% | 7 | 16.67% | 7 | 25% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Linnaeus (1758) | 7 | 2.94% | 6 | 14.29% | 6 | 21.43% | 3 | 10% |
| Gilot et al. (1992) | 6 | 2.52% | 5 | 11.9% | 5 | 17.86% | 3 | 10% |
| Saint et al. (1978) | 6 | 2.52% | 6 | 14.29% | 6 | 21.43% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Chaezl & Chazel (2011) | 5 | 2.1% | 5 | 11.9% | 5 | 17.86% | 4 | 13.33% |
| Ariagno et al. (2016) | 4 | 1.68% | 4 | 9.52% | 4 | 14.29% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Barthe et al. (2024) | 4 | 1.68% | 4 | 9.52% | 3 | 10.71% | 3 | 10% |
| Euzet & Jourdane (1968) | 3 | 1.26% | 3 | 7.14% | 3 | 10.71% | 0 | 0% |
| Faugier (2011) | 3 | 1.26% | 3 | 7.14% | 3 | 10.71% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Igea et al. (2015) | 3 | 1.26% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Nicolas et al. (2017) | 3 | 1.26% | 3 | 7.14% | 3 | 10.71% | 3 | 10% |
| Raynaud et Heim de Balsac (1940) | 3 | 1.26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Vesmanis et al. (1982) | 3 | 1.26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Wagler (1832) | 3 | 1.26% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Beaucournu & Gilot (1971) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 2 | 7.14% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Brünner et al. (2002) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 2 | 7.14% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Burneleau (1983) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 2 | 7.14% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Butet & Leroux (1993) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 2 | 7.14% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Castiglia et al. (2007) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 2 | 7.14% | 0 | 0% |
| Charissou (2001) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 2 | 7.14% | 0 | 0% |
| Grulich (1971) | 2 | 0.84% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Hausser (1978) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 2 | 7.14% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Kahmann & Kahmann (1954) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Miller (1907) | 2 | 0.84% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Millet (1828) | 2 | 0.84% | 2 | 4.76% | 2 | 7.14% | 2 | 6.67% |
| Pallas (1831) | 2 | 0.84% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Wagler (1832) | 2 | 0.84% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Anonyme. (2004) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Araigno (2007) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Basset & Hausser (2003) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Bechstein (1800) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Bonaparte (1840) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Bouche (2000) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Brumpt (1923) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Burton (1995) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Chabasse et al. (1987) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Chastel et al. (1994) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Crochet (1990) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Desbrosses (1996) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Dollfus & Callot (1944) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Heim de Balsac (1940) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Hermann (1783) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Jourdane (1977) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Kerr (1792) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Linnaeus (1763) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Linnaeus (1766) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Morel (1959) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Müller (1776) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Némoz & Bertrand (2008) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Nicolas et al. (2021) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Niort (1949) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Omar et al. (2011) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Pascal & Vigne (2003) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Pascal & Vigne (2003) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Pascal (2003) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Pennant (1771) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Phillips et al. (2013) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Probst & Tézier (2000) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Puissauve & Haffner (2015) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Rode (1938) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Russell & Le Corre (2009) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Salamolard (2002) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Schinz (1837) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Sélys-longchamps (1839) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
| Sheftel (2018) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Taberlet (1983) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Theron (1976) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Thévenot (2014) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Tillon & Lorvelec (2004) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 1 | 3.33% |
| Tournier & Miquet (1990) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Uicn et al. (2015) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Vigne & Pascal (2003) | 1 | 0.42% | 1 | 2.38% | 1 | 3.57% | 0 | 0% |
| Zimmermann (1780) | 1 | 0.42% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% |
